Consider neofs-testlib integration to this repo #263

New issue

Closed

opened 2025-12-28 18:15:33 +00:00 by sami · 2 comments

sami commented

2025-12-28 18:15:33 +00:00

Owner

Originally created by @carpawell on GitHub (Mar 18, 2024).

I'm always frustrated when I have to know about testlib and understand how to change some code in the built venv (do i have any alternative?). Do we expect that somebody (some other our repo?) will use that internal code?

Describe the solution you'd like

Put tetslib code here.

Describe alternatives you've considered

None.

Additional context

I run international tests sometimes locally and I do change test code and do need to check behavior changes. Changing a local code is fine for me. Changing an external dependency is not that simple for me.
Also, we do hotfixes sometimes. Fix application time is longer than I would expect now (see https://github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-testlib/pull/98).

Originally created by @carpawell on GitHub (Mar 18, 2024). ## Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. I'm always frustrated when I have to know about testlib and understand how to change some code in the built venv (do i have any alternative?). Do we expect that somebody (some other our repo?) will use that internal code? ## Describe the solution you'd like Put tetslib code here. ## Describe alternatives you've considered None. ## Additional context I run international tests sometimes locally and I do change test code and do need to check behavior changes. Changing a local code is fine for me. Changing an external dependency is not that simple for me. Also, we do hotfixes sometimes. Fix application time is longer than I would expect now (see https://github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-testlib/pull/98).

sami

2025-12-28 18:15:33 +00:00

closed this issue
added the
enhancement

I2

U4

S2

dependencies
labels

sami commented

2025-12-28 18:15:34 +00:00

Author

Owner

@roman-khimov commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2024):

I think I'm OK with it, but let's wait to see if there are any other considerations that may appear.

@roman-khimov commented on GitHub (Mar 18, 2024): I think I'm OK with it, but let's wait to see if there are any other considerations that may appear.

sami commented

2025-12-28 18:15:34 +00:00

Author

Owner

@roman-khimov commented on GitHub (Mar 19, 2024):

Licenses are the same, btw.

@roman-khimov commented on GitHub (Mar 19, 2024): Licenses are the same, btw.