Experimental meta attribute #502

New issue

Closed

opened 2025-12-28 17:37:37 +00:00 by sami · 0 comments

sami commented

2025-12-28 17:37:37 +00:00

Owner

Originally created by @roman-khimov on GitHub (Apr 4, 2025).

Originally assigned to: @smallhive on GitHub.

I'm always frustrated when we can't easily test meta (https://github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/issues/2878).

Describe the solution you'd like

For a quick fix (we'll need it to be a part of bucket policy in future) let's add an experimental neofs.metadata_policy setting with "strict", "optimistic" and unset values. If not set --- the behavior is the same as now. If set, the value should be put into __NEOFS__METAINFO_CONSISTENCY NeoFS container attribute.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Proper bucket policy, will take more time, but to be done eventually.

Originally created by @roman-khimov on GitHub (Apr 4, 2025). Originally assigned to: @smallhive on GitHub. ## Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. I'm always frustrated when we can't easily test meta (https://github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-node/issues/2878). ## Describe the solution you'd like For a quick fix (we'll need it to be a part of bucket policy in future) let's add an experimental `neofs.metadata_policy` setting with "strict", "optimistic" and unset values. If not set --- the behavior is the same as now. If set, the value should be put into `__NEOFS__METAINFO_CONSISTENCY` NeoFS container attribute. ## Describe alternatives you've considered Proper bucket policy, will take more time, but to be done eventually.