Caching of EACL #102

Closed
opened 2025-12-28 17:36:18 +00:00 by sami · 3 comments
Owner

Originally created by @KirillovDenis on GitHub (Aug 6, 2021).

Originally assigned to: @realloc, @alexvanin, @KirillovDenis, @carpawell, @masterSplinter01, @cthulhu-rider on GitHub.

Should we cache eACL on s3-gate side in view of storage node also caches it?

Originally created by @KirillovDenis on GitHub (Aug 6, 2021). Originally assigned to: @realloc, @alexvanin, @KirillovDenis, @carpawell, @masterSplinter01, @cthulhu-rider on GitHub. Should we cache eACL on s3-gate side in view of storage node also caches it?
sami 2025-12-28 17:36:18 +00:00
Author
Owner

@realloc commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2021):

We should have the "small cache" for eACL responses with the SideChain block generation time TTL.

Maybe that should be done as a part of Container Cache, as we use container attributes a lot.

@realloc commented on GitHub (Aug 11, 2021): We should have the "small cache" for eACL responses with the SideChain block generation time TTL. Maybe that should be done as a part of Container Cache, as we use container attributes a lot.
Author
Owner

@KirillovDenis commented on GitHub (Aug 12, 2021):

I believe that this problem can be turned into a task of implementing an ACL validation layer before executing the business logic.

@KirillovDenis commented on GitHub (Aug 12, 2021): I believe that this problem can be turned into a task of implementing an ACL validation layer before executing the business logic.
Author
Owner

@realloc commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2021):

We need to cache not the eACL, but the internal S3 ACL representation. The S3 ACL must be able to be saved as eACl to make the S3 gateway stateless.

The summary of the discussion is that we need to implement ti ACL processing layer first.

@realloc commented on GitHub (Aug 26, 2021): We need to cache not the eACL, but the internal S3 ACL representation. The S3 ACL must be able to be saved as eACl to make the S3 gateway stateless. The summary of the discussion is that we need to implement ti ACL processing layer first.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
nspcc-dev/neofs-s3-gw#102
No description provided.