Add split object meta into signed data #1255

Closed
opened 2025-12-28 17:22:21 +00:00 by sami · 1 comment
Owner

Originally created by @roman-khimov on GitHub (Sep 11, 2024).

Originally assigned to: @carpawell on GitHub.

I'm always frustrated when we can't easily untangle big object status based on meta info.

Describe the solution you'd like

Extend data added in #2928 to contain split id associated things. The goal is to have enough data to avoid network communication when processing big objects.

Originally created by @roman-khimov on GitHub (Sep 11, 2024). Originally assigned to: @carpawell on GitHub. ## Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. I'm always frustrated when we can't easily untangle big object status based on meta info. ## Describe the solution you'd like Extend data added in #2928 to contain split id associated things. The goal is to have enough data to avoid network communication when processing big objects.
sami 2025-12-28 17:22:21 +00:00
Author
Owner

@carpawell commented on GitHub (Dec 12, 2024):

The goal is to have enough data to avoid network communication when processing big objects.

@roman-khimov, what is the exact use case here? The simplest thing is to try to put every part in the message. But the message could be really big then. Also, we now know that we try to minimize our our lists in the meta info. It may have first object ID, link object ID, or both but that is not "avoid network communication".

@carpawell commented on GitHub (Dec 12, 2024): > The goal is to have enough data to avoid network communication when processing big objects. @roman-khimov, what is the exact use case here? The simplest thing is to try to put every part in the message. But the message could be really big then. Also, we now know that we [try to minimize our](https://github.com/nspcc-dev/neofs-contract/pull/448#discussion_r1860489419) our lists in the meta info. It may have first object ID, link object ID, or both but that is not "avoid network communication".
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
nspcc-dev/neofs-node#1255
No description provided.